Internationale Ansprechpartner im Telekommunikationssektor

Tags: bnetza bundesnetzagentur tk ict

Author: T

Eine Liste von der BNetzA mit Aufsichtsbehoerden verschiedener Laender.
Quelle: https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Allgemeines/Bundesnetzagentur/Internationales/InternationaleEinrichtungen.xls?__blob=publicationFile&v=11

0 passed all checks
14 failed one or more checks
0 failed all checks within a group
14 failed critical checks

36 websites
22 scan errors
8 could not be judged (no data)
0 are excluded from scans

Take the results shown on this page with a grain of salt! Some of our checks may report wrong results.

What is this? This page shows a summary of a machine-generated analysis of several web pages commissioned by a PrivacyScore user. During the analysis it was checked whether the privacy of the visitors is protected on a technical level as well as possible when visiting the given Internet addresses, and whether the operator uses common security mechanisms on the website. This can indicate how seriously an operator takes data protection. However, it is not possible to determine the actual security level achieved. More details please!

How are the results presented? Our analysis focuses on the following aspects: whether tracking services are used ("NoTrack" category), whether selected attacks are prevented, the quality of encryption during data transmission to the website (EncWeb), and the quality when sending e-mails to an existing e-mail server (EncMail). You can control how important these four criteria are for you with the arrows in the column headings.

What exactly is checked and what do the results mean? We check the internet addresses with several techniques, which we have described in detail in a research paper. You can display a list of all checks and explanations of their relevance by clicking on the address of a web page to display its detailed results.

What is the purpose of PrivacyScore? With PrivacyScore we make websites publicly comparable in terms of selected properties. As scientists, we are interested in how users and operators deal with this form of transparency. Among other things, this raises the question of whether website operators have an additional incentive to improve their websites.

What can be concluded from the results, what not?

No statement about the importance of the categories. The table sorts the listed web pages according to the importance you specify. The further up a website is sorted, the more tests it has passed in the respective categories. In the event of a tie, the following category will decide. The default sorting is according to the category "No Track", followed by "EncWeb", "Attacks", and "EncMail". However, this default ranking should not be interpreted as an indication of the importance of the categories.

No statement on necessity. The fact that a web page is ranked at the lower end says nothing about its absolute security level. The results shown on this page merely provide information on how the listed websites perform in a direct comparison. Some security mechanisms are only necessary to protect against strong attacks (e.g., governments).

Limited expressiveness. The results cover only security mechanisms that can be observed from outside when visiting the specified Internet addresses. It is quite possible that an operator uses additional internal protection mechanisms and therefore has decided to leave out some externally visible mechanisms. Furthermore, it is possible that additional security mechanisms are used on individual pages (e.g., for the transmission of passwords). However, such variations are not taken into account in the analysis. Therefore, one cannot conclude from the failure of individual tests that a provider does not handle personal data with sufficient care. On the other hand, however, it is also possible that a website has serious security holes, although it achieves a good result on this page.

» Configure sorting and grouping

Sorting and grouping

NO SCANS RUNNING

Download List as CSV

— INFLUENCING THE RANKING —

You can influence the ranking by your preferences. Use the and arrows to change the importance (left means more important).

At the moment we only provide one ranking scheme that consists of the following categories: NoTrack, EncWeb, Attacks, and EncMail. We perform a priorized sort to obtain the ranking: We start with the first category, sorting the sites according to their rating: . Sites with an identical rating in a category are further sorted considering the next category to the right. This procedure is repeated until all categories have been considered.

Ranking

#	URL	Land	Behörde	NoTrack	Attacks	EncMail	EncWeb
1	http://www.ficora.fi/en/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:40:42	Finnland	Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority	good	warning	good	warning
2	http://www.ibpt.be/Home.aspx / 2023-01-04 @ 16:42:00	Belgien	Institut Belge des Postes et Télécommunications	good	warning	good	critical
3	http://www.npt.no/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:42:26	Norwegen	Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority	good	warning	neutral	critical
4	http://www.hakom.hr/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:42:20	Kroatien	Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industries	good	warning	warning	warning
5	http://www.agcom.it/ (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:00	Italien	Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni	neutral	neutral	good	neutral
6	http://www.ak.llv.li/ (1 failure) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:35	Liechtenstein	Office for Communications	neutral	neutral	neutral	warning
7	http://www.en.uke.gov.pl/ (1 failure) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:09	Polen	Office of Electronic Telecommunications	neutral	neutral	neutral	critical
8	http://www.dba.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/ (1 failure) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:18	Dänemark	Danish Business Authority	neutral	neutral	neutral	critical
8	http://www.ctu.eu/main.php (1 failure) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:30	Tschechische Republik	Czech Telecommunication Office	neutral	neutral	neutral	critical
9	http://www.anacom.pt/render.jsp (3 failures) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:16	Portugal	Autoridade Nacional de Comunicações	neutral	neutral	neutral	neutral
10	http://www.rtr.at/ (3 failures) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:18	Österreich	Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications	neutral	neutral	neutral	neutral
11	http://www.acm.nl/en/ (2 failures) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:21	Niederlande	Authority for Consumers and Markets	neutral	neutral	neutral	warning
12	http://www.eett.gr/opencms/opencms/EETT_EN/index.html (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:38	Griechenland	National Telecommunications and Post Commission of Greece	neutral	neutral	neutral	warning
13	http://www.teleoff.gov.sk/ (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:33	Slowakische Republik	Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of the Slovak Republic	neutral	neutral	neutral	warning
14	http://www.btk.gov.tr/ (1 failure) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:28:50	Türkei	Information Technologies and Communication Authority	neutral	neutral	neutral	warning
15	http://www.ocecpr.org.cy/nqcontent.cfm (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:21	Zypern	Office of the Commissioner of Electronic Telecommunications and Postal Regulation	neutral	neutral	neutral	critical
16	http://www.crc.bg/index.php (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:16:48	Bulgarien	Communications Regulation Commission	neutral	neutral	warning	neutral
17	http://www.ratel.rs/home.136.html (2 failures) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:49	Serbien	Republic Agency for Electronic Communications	neutral	neutral	warning	neutral
18	http://www.fcc.gov/ (1 failure) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:30:14	USA	Federal Communications Commission (FCC)	neutral	neutral	warning	critical
19	http://www.cnmc.es/ (1 failure) / 2023-01-04 @ 16:48:15	Spanien	Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia	warning	good	neutral	critical
20	http://www.konkurentsiamet.ee/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:42:21	Estland	Estonian Competition Authority	warning	good	neutral	critical
21	http://www.comreg.ie/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:40:40	Irland	Commission for Communications Regulation	warning	good	warning	critical
22	http://www.pts.se/en-gb/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:40:45	Schweden	Swedish Post & Telecommunications Agency	warning	warning	good	warning
23	http://www.ofcom.org.uk/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:42:26	Großbritannien	Office of Communications	warning	warning	good	warning
24	http://www.mca.org.mt/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:41:11	Malta	Malta Communications Authority	warning	warning	good	warning
25	http://www.pfs.is/default.aspx / 2023-01-04 @ 16:39:48	Island	Post and Telecom Administration	warning	warning	good	warning
26	http://www.sprk.gov.lv/ / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:25	Lettland	PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Electronic Communications and Post Department	warning	warning	good	critical
27	http://www.arcep.fr/ (2 failures) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:14:50	Frankreich	Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes	warning	warning	neutral	neutral
28	http://www.bakom.admin.ch/index.html (1 failure) / 2023-01-04 @ 16:46:23	Schweiz	Federal Office for Communications	warning	warning	neutral	critical
29	http://www.rrt.lt/en/home.html (1 failure) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:27	Litauen	Communications Regulatory Authority	warning	warning	neutral	critical
30	http://www.ancom.org.ro/ / 2023-01-04 @ 16:40:30	Rumänien	National Authority for Management and Regulation in Communications of Romania	warning	warning	warning	critical
31	http://www.aec.mk/index.php (1 failure) / 2024-01-02 @ 05:29:01	Frühere Jugoslawische Republik Mazedonien	Agency for Electronic Communications	n/a
31	http://www.ilr.public.lu/ / 2024-01-02 @ 05:27:08	Luxemburg	Institut Luxembourgeois de Régulation	n/a
31	http://www.ekip.me/eng/ (1 failure) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:23	Montenegro	Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services	n/a
31	http://www.apek.si/apek-ang / 2024-04-14 @ 01:15:27	Solwenien	Post and Electronic Communications Agency RS	n/a
31	http://www.english.nmhh.hu/ (1 failure) / 2024-04-14 @ 01:14:50	Ungarn	Nemzeti Média és Hírközlési Hatóság	n/a

Sites excluded from scans

Site owners can ask us to not perform further scans of their sites. For reasons of transparency we archive the result of the last successful scan here.

No sites are excluded from scans at the moment.

PrivacyScore BETA